Sign in or 
Share this
demo page 16
State: Maryland
Complaint: 1
Terrorism to the United States Constitutional by members of the Montgomery County Judicial System Members of the Montgomery County District and Circuit Court of Maryland are violating individuals: 1st Amendment Rights, 5th Amendment Rights, 7th Amendment Rights, and 8th Amendment Rights. 9th Amendment Rights and 14thAmendment Rights under the United States Constitutional the following individuals: Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington: Judge John W. Debelius III, Judge Brian G. Kim, Judge Cheryl Ann McCally, Judge Durke G. Thompson, Judge Michael J. Algeo, Judge Gary L. Crawford, Judge Thomas L. Craven, Judge Eugene Wolfe, Asst. State Attorney Jessica Hall, Public Defender John M. Strayer. These individuals have maliciously prosecuted, falsely incarcerated, falsified court documents, tamper with court documents, and/or deprived individuals of their rights and privileges secured by the Constitution of the United States and the rules and laws of the state of Maryland. The individuals have also cover-up corruption and conspiracies within in the Judicial System of Maryland under. After filing several complaints with members of the Administrative Branch of the Maryland Government: Montgomery County Executive, Mr. Isaiah Leggett, Governor, Mr. Martin O’Malley, Attorney General of Maryland Douglas F. Gansler, Congressman Chris Van Hollen, Congressman John P. Sarbanes, Senator Barbara A. Mikulski, Senator Steny H. Hoyer, About the corruption and the violation of citizen rights with in the Montgomery County Judicial System these individuals cover-up the corruption and conspiracies. Complaint 2 On February 27th, 2007, Mr. Moment, filed a Complaint for Custody of his “minor son”, born April 7th, 2005. Mr. Moment basis for filing the complaint was due to Mr. Moment finding marks on the “minor child,” and for the abuse and neglecting of the “minor child” and because of illegal activity the mother, Ms. Felita A. Phillips was involved in. On May 4th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a second complaint for custody case#FL-62216 after Ms. Phillips refuse to accept the first complaint this time Mr. Moment had the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office serve Ms. Phillips on May 14th, 2007 the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office served Ms. Phillips. On June 15th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a Request for Order of Default in case#FL-62216. On July 2nd, 2007, the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington signed the Order of Default in case # FL- 62216. (This order was not recorded in court records or docket entries) On July 5th, 2007, Ms. Phillips filed a Motion to Vacate the Order of Default and her Answer to Complaint for Custody, which was writing, by a member of the Montgomery County Circuit Court was entered into the recorded. On July 10th, 2007, the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington declared Ms. Phillips to be in default in case#FL-62216. On July 10th, 2007, the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington July 2nd, 2007, signed Order of Default was entire into the record in case#FL-62216. On July 10th, 2007, the order declaring Ms. Phillips to be in default in case#FL-62216 was mailed to Ms. Phillips and Mr. Moment. On July 10th, 2007, the clerk of the Circuit Court states they mailed a notice of default to Ms. Phillips. On July 24th, 2007, Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington granted Ms. Phillips motion to vacate the Order of Default case#FL-62216. (This order was not recorded in court records or docket entries) On July 26th, 2007, court records state that Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington granting Ms. Phillips Motion to Vacate the Order of Default was enter into the record. On August 23rd, 2007, court records state that the Order of Default sent to Mr. Moment was returned in case#FL-62216. On August 24th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed the first Motion for Continuance in case#FL-62216 pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508. (This motion was not recorded into the court records or docket entries) On August 31st, 2007, Mr. Moment had to re-file a second Motion for Continuance because Mr. Moment forgot to signed the August 24th, 2007, Motion for Continuance in case#FL-62216. (This motion was not recorded into the court records or docket entries) On October 19th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a third Motion for Continuance in case#FL-62216 pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508. On October 22nd, 2007, court records states that a Motion for Continuance was filed. The courts records dose not state that a copy of the order denying the motion was mailed to Mr. Moment or Ms. Phillips. On October 29th, 2007, Ms. Phillips filled a Motion to Deny and /or Dismiss Mr. Moment’s Motion for Continuance. On October 29th, 2007, court records state that returned mail address to Mr. Moment was re-mailed to new address. On November 1st, 2007, court records states that Ms. Phillips Motion to Deny and /or Dismiss Mr. Moment’s Motion for Continuance were filed. On November 9th, 2007, court records state that Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington denied Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips motions. Records also state that on November 9th, 2007, the order was entered and copies mailed. On November 13th, 2007, Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips came before Judge Craven L. Thomas of Montgomery County of Maryland Circuit Court for trail on custody at trail Judge Thomas denied Mr. Moment a continuance. Judge Thomas also awarded Ms. Phillips legal and physical custody of the “minor child”. On November 13th, 2007, Mr. Moment received an order of court denying his Motion for Continuance from Judge Harrington. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Mr. Moment is the biological father of the “minor child” born April 7th, 2005. Ms. Phillips is the biological mother of the “minor child”. Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips had been in a relationship from 2002 until December 2006. In the month of August 2004, Ms. Phillips and Mr. Moment talked about having a child. On April 7th, 2005, their son was born; both Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips had been the primary caregivers. Mr. Moment had been a consistent figure in the lives of the Ms. Phillips and the daughter of Ms. Phillips and his son’s life until December 26th, 2006, when Mr. Moment presented Ms. Phillips with a custody agreement. Mr. Moment had lived at the same address as Ms. Phillips from 2003 until December 26th, 2006. Mr. Moment was removed from the home because Ms. Phillips started filing false complaint on Mr. Moment, due to the custody matter. Mr. Moment contends that Ms. Phillips was abusing and neglecting there “minor child” and involved in some illegal activity. On December 26th, 2006, Mr. Moment informed Ms. Phillips that he was leaving with their son because of the marks the he find on their son and for the illegal activity of Ms. Phillips, swindling people out of their homes. Mr. Moment also learned that Ms. Phillips had not paid her business and personal taxes for the last ten years and that the money that he was given her to pay the bills was not being used on the bills. Mr. Moment also found out that their son’s name had been changed from his birth name and that his name had been removed from his son’s birth certificate. On March 12th, 2007, Mr. Moment mailed the first complaint case#60700-FL by certified mail with return receipt to Ms. Phillips. Ms. Phillips refused to pick up the complaint after repeated notice that the custody documents were at the post office. After Ms. Phillips refuse to pick up the custody documents within the 60 days given to Mr. Moment to serve the complaint. Mr. Moment had to re-file the complaint case#FL-62216 a second time. At this time, Mr. Moment had the Montgomery County Sheriff Office to serve Ms. Phillips. On May 14th, 2007 the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office served Ms. Phillips. On June 15th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a Request for Order of Default because Ms. Phillips had not filed an answer or contested Mr. Moment second complaint for custody case#FL-62216 this request was granted the same day by the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington. On July 2nd, 2007, the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington signed the Order of Default (this order is not recorded in court records or docket entries) On July 5th, 2007; a Motion to Vacate Order of Default, which was writing, by a member of the Montgomery County Circuit Court was file on behalf of Ms. Phillips. Also on July 5th, 2007, an answer to Mr. Moment complaint for custody case#FL-62216 that was also writing by a member of the Montgomery County Circuit Court was filed on behalf of Ms. Phillips. On July 5th, 2007, Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips had a scheduling hearing in Circuit Court case#62216-FL; Mr. Moment was denied transport to this hearing by the Montgomery County Correction Facility. On July 10th, 2007, the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington declared Ms. Phillips to be in default. Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington signed the Order of Default and it was entered against Ms. Phillips. On July 10th, 2007, notices of Default Order were mailed to Ms. Phillips. On July 10th, 2007, Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips had a scheduling hearing in Circuit Court cae#60700-FL, Mr. Moment again was denied transport to this hearing by the Montgomery County Correction Facility. On July 24th, 2007, Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington vacated Mr. Moment’s Order of Default of July 10th, 2007 and on July 26th, 2007; the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington Order was entered into court records. On August 24th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed his first Motion for Continuance pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508; (this motion was not recorded in court records or docket entries) this motion was returned because Mr. Moment had not signed the motion. On August 31st, 2007, Mr. Moment filed his second Motion for Continuance pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508, (this motion was not recorded in court records or docket entries) On October 19th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a third Motion for Continuance pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508, (this motion was not recorded in court records or docket entries) On October 26th, 2007, Ms. Phillips filled a letter to counter complaint for custody, also on October 26th, 2007; Ms. Phillips filed a Motion to Dismiss Mr. Moment’s Complaint for Custody. On October 29th, 2007, Ms. Phillips filed a Motion to Deny and / or Dismiss Mr. Moment’s Motion for Continuance. On November 2nd, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a Motion to Deny Ms. Phillips’s Motion to Dismiss the Mr. Moment’s Complaint for Custody; On November 9th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a Motion to Ms. Phillips’s letter to counter complaint for custody (this motion was not recorded in court records or docket entries) On November 13th, 2007, Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips came before Judge Thomas L. Craven of the Montgomery County of Maryland Circuit Court for trail on custody of “minor child”. At trail Judge Craven, denied Mr. Moment request for a continuance. Judge Craven also awarded Ms. Phillips legal and physical custody of the “minor child”. On November 13th, 2007, Mr. Moment received an order from the court denying his Motion for Continuance from Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington (this motion was not recorded in court records or docket entries) On November 14th, 2007, court records states that Mr. Moment’s November 9th, 2007; Motion to Deny Ms. Phillips letter to counter complaint for custody was filed. On November 21st, 2007, Mr. Moment received custody order from the court. STANDARD OF REVIEW Mr. Moment review of a trial court’s ruling on the admission of evidence is based on the premise that exclusion or admission of evidence is a function of the trial court. The trial court therefore, has liberal authority to make such decisions. However, the Appeals Court will reverse the exclusion or admission of evidence by the trial court, if there is a determination that the ruling is both “manifestly wrong and substantially injurious” to the prejudiced party Angelakis v. Teimourian, 150, Md. App. 507 822 A. 2d 494 (2003). ARGUMENT I. Whether the trial court’s decision to deny Mr. Moment a continuance pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508(a), (b) violated the Mr. Moment’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment II. Whether the trial court violated Mr. Moment due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment refuse to grant Mr. Moment custody of the “minor child” by a final judgment of default pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (b), (c), (f), (g) and 37 CFR 2.16 (a) and 2.114 (a); FRCP 55 (a) and 55 (b); and TBMP 317. III. Whether the trial court violated Mr. Moment due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment when court documents were alter and back date to give custody to Ms. Phillips IV. Whether the trial court violated Mr. Moment due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to deprive Mr. Moment to be a father to his child. The trial court error in its ruling to deny Mr. Moment’s motion for continuance pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508 (a), (b), to allow Mr. Moment one continuance. Given Mr. Moment time to prepare and gather his witnesses and evidence under the circumstances and in the interest of justice and due process of the law. The trial court erred in vacating Mr. Moment judgment by default pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (b), (c), (f), and (g) because Ms. Phillips failed to file a legal or factual reason for failing to plead within the 30 days given. On June 15th, 2007, Mr. Moment filed a Request for Order of Default in case#FL-62216, because Ms. Phillips had failed to response to the complaint pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (b), provides: (b) Order of default: (If the time for pleading has expired and a defendant has failed to plead as provided by these rules, the court, on written request of the plaintiff, shall enter an order of default. The request shall state the last know address of the defendant.) In the court records, which states that Mr. Moment’s request was granted by the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington and filed on July 15th, 2007? Pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613(c), (this states that the notice is to be mailed promptly upon entry of an order of default.) In the court records, this states that the Notice of Default Order was mailed to Ms. Phillips on July 10th, 2007. On July 2nd, 2007, the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington signed the order of default declaring Ms. Phillips to be in default and on July 10th, 2007, the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County enter the judgment pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613(f) and pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 3-601 (a), (b), (d) On July 5th, 2007, Ms. Phillips filed a Motion to Vacate Order of Default and the Answer to Complaint for Custody pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (d). (d) Motion by Defendant. (The defendant may move to vacate the order of default within 30 days after its entry. The motion shall state the reasons for the failure to plead and the legal and factual basis for the defense to the claim.) 1. After Ms. Phillips filed a Motion to Vacate the Order of Default the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington still found that Ms. Phillips’s reasons were not a substantial and sufficient reason for failing to plead. The court on July 10th, 2007, entered a final judgment with relief against Ms. Phillips pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (f). 2. The only reason the judgment was revise by the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington was because a complaint was filed by Mr. Moment with the Governor‘s Office of corruption by the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington and within the Montgomery County Judicial System. 3. Pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (g) this revise ruling was clearly an abuse of the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington and the court’s discretionary power. 4. Not only was it abuse of the court’s power but also under Title 18, U.S.C. § 1018 it is a crime. Mr. Moment the date that the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington signed the order which was July 2nd, 2007, this date was altered from a one to a two and also the stamp date of entered was alter from July 1st, 2007, to July 10th, 2007. The bottom half of the order with the relief for Mr. Moment was re-moved and replace with a different bottom half. The order, which was signed by the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington on July 2nd, 2007, in the court records there is no signed order on July 1st, or 2nd, 2007, are of any document on that date in court records. This Order of Default by court records was granted by the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington on July 10th, 2007, Mr. Moment argued that Ms. Phillips was will pass the 30 days allowed to file an answer and that the court documents were back date. 5. On July 5th, 2007, four days after the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington signed and mailed the order declaring Ms. Phillips to be in default court records state that Ms. Phillips filed a Motion to Vacate Order of Default and the Answer to Complaint for Custody pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613(d). (d) Motion by Defendant. (The defendant may move to vacate the order of default within 30 days after its entry. The motion shall state the reasons for the failure to plead and the legal and factual basis for the defense to the claim.) 1. In Harris v. Carter, 71 Md. App. 257, 524 A. 2d 1250 (1987), on appeal the Court of Appeals held that Judge Kaplan erred in vacating the default order. The court reasoned that Carter’s motion to vacate contained neither the legal nor the factual basis for her defense, in contravention of Rule [2-613 (d)], that Carter’s answer to Harris, complaint did not cure this defect, and that Judge Kaplan therefore abused his discretion in vacating the default order. 2. Mr. Moment argued that the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington ruled that Ms. Phillips motion contained neither the legal nor the factual basis for her defense and therefore declared Ms. Phillips to be in default on July 10th, 2007. 3. Mr. Moment argued that the allowed 30 days had expired of the date of entry and the court documents were back date so the default could be vacated. 4. Mr. Moment argued that Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington abused her discretion in vacating a final judgment. 5. Mr. Moment argued that four days after Ms. Phillips filed her motions the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-601 (a), (b), still entered the order of default that the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington sign declaring Ms. Phillips to be in default. 6. Mr. Moment argued that this order was entered July 10th, 2007, and copies of this order of judgment were mailed to Ms. Phillips and Mr. Moment on the same day. Mr. Moment argues that pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 1-323 Proof of Service, (The clerk shall not accept for filing any pleading or other paper requiring service, other then an original pleading, unless it is accompanied by an admission or waiver of service or a signed certificate showing the date and manner of making service. A certificate of service is prima facie proof of service.) Ms. Phillips and the clerk of the court Ms. Loretta E. Knight and the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington knew that Mr. Moment was incarcerated in the Montgomery County Correctional Facility. (a.) On June 22, 2007, Ms. Phillips was in court when Mr. Moment was incarcerated on her false complaints (b.) On July 5, 2007, Ms. Phillips informed a Master of Family Division in a hearing that Mr. Moment has been incarcerated since June 7, 2007, and that Mr. Moment had three 90-day sentences. (c.) Ms. Knight is the clerk of the court and the case mangers and staff at the Montgomery County Correctional Facility was calling and talking with her about having Mr. Moment transport to court for his custody cases which is documented. (d.) The Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington was the judge Mr. Moment was writing to while incarcerated about the conspiracy and corruption within the Judicial System of Montgomery County. Each one of this individual knew where Mr. Moment last address was but Ms. Phillips still sent the court documents to P.O. Box 5298 Hyattsville, MD 20782, knowing this address was not the last known address of Mr. Moment pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 1-321(a) and 1-323, (e). These documents were sent to this address because Ms. Phillips was in control of this P.O. Box and Ms. Phillips knew that that Mr. Moment would not receive or respond to any of Ms. Phillips’s motions or documents sent there. It is clear that Ms. Phillips knew where Mr. Moment was and it is also clear that Ms. Phillips did not officially serve Mr. Moment with the Motion to Vacate or the Answer to Complaint for Custody pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 1-321(a) therefore Ms. Phillips motions should not have been entered into the record and Ms. Phillips answer is a non-answer and her motion to vacate should not have been enter into the record it is also clear that Ms. Phillips acted willfully or contumaciously in serving Mr. Moment, Jennifer Flynn v. Dannie May Jr., No. 1719, September Term, 2003. Ms. Phillips failed to take any steps to have the Judgment of Default stricken after July 10th, 2007 is within the 30 days prescribed by the Maryland Rules of Procedure. And, as a result, the Final Judgment by Default stands. In a well-settled cases makes it clear an order of default is no longer appeal able as a final judgment, Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, 337 Md. 412 425-26, 653 A. 2d 934 (1995), Breur v. Flynn, 64 Md. App. 409, 420, 496 A. 2d 695 (1985), and Bliss v. Wiatrowski, 125 Md. App. 258, 265, 724 A. 2d 1264 (1999). When Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington vacated Mr. Moment’s Judgment of Default on July 26th, 2007, Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington error in a well-settled case makes it clear that an order of default is interlocutory in nature and can be revised by the court at any time up until the point a final judgment is entered. Holly Hall v. County Banking and Trust, 147 Md. App. 251, 261-62, 807 A. 2d 1201 (2002), and Paul Niemeyer and Linda Schuett, Maryland Rules Commentary at 469-74 (2d ed. 1992). Pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-601(a), (b), (c) on July 10th, 2007, the order became final. On November 13, 2007, Mr. Moment and Ms. Phillips went before Judge Thomas L. Craven of the Montgomery County of Maryland Circuit Court for trail on custody of the “minor child” due to the final judgment of July 10th, 2007, Judge Thomas should have award custody of the “minor child” to Mr. Moment but Judge Thomas err in allowed the trail to continue. When Judge Thomas went and permitted the trail to precede Judge Thomas err denying Mr. Moment a continuance and proceeded with the trail. Mr. Moment argues that he had no evidence because he was incarceration and could not prepare his case. In this trail the only testimony given was from Ms. Phillips. Judge Thomas awarded Ms. Phillips legal and physical custody of the “minor child”. Judge Thomas error when he refuse Mr. Moment request for a continuance pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508 (a) to give him time to prepare and gather his witnesses and evidence and Mr. Moment V, XIV Amendment were violated Judge Thomas deprived Mr. Moment of due process of the law and deny him equal protection of the laws. Judge Thomas also error when he went forward with the case after a final judgment was entered. STANDARD OF REVIEW Did the trial court err in not granting Mr. Moment a judgment by default and Mr. Moment a continuance in derogation of his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? The trial court erred when it granted Ms. Phillips legal and physical custody of the “minor child” over Mr. Moment. In this case, the application of Ms. Phillips filing statute was unconstitutional. Mr. Moment Motion for Continuance and Request for Order of Default, were deny in retaliation and Mr. Moment due process rights were violated when Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington and Judge Craven L. Thomas deny Mr. Moment Motion for Continuance and the vacating of Mr. Moment’s final judgment of default pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-508(a), (b) and pursuant to Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-613 (b), (c), (f), (g). The Circuit Court for Montgomery County of Maryland and the Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington on July 10th, 2007, found that Ms. Phillips failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 2-613(d) 71. Md. App. 257, 524, A.2d 1250 (1987), upon Ms. Phillips failed requirement the court enter a final judgment on July 10th, 2007, with relief and Ms. Phillips took no steps to have the Final Judgment of Default stricken after July 10th, 2007 are within the 30 days prescribed by the Maryland Rules of Procedure and therefore the Judgment by Default should stands. It is also clear that Mr. Moment officially did not receive the motions to vacate or answer to the complaint that Ms. Phillips filed. It is also clear that Ms. Phillips know where Mr. Moment last address was to send the motions but Ms. Phillips refuse to send the motion to Mr. Moment. Therefore Ms. Phillips did not officially, legally or technical file a motion to vacate or an answer to Mr. Moment complaint and therefore custody of the minor child should have been award to Mr. Moment. Then Mr. Moment filed an appeal and after the Court of Special Appeals for Maryland ordered Mr. Moment to file a copy of the transcripts the hearing of November 13, 2007 with his brief. Three days after Mr. Moment ordered the transcripts Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington issue a bench warrant for Mr. Moment’s arrest. Mr. Moment was held for 63 days and after the Court of Special Appeals dismisses Mr. Moment’s appeal Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington dismiss the charges and release Mr. Moment from jail. Then Administrative Judge Ann S. Harrington stacked a judicial search with the same cases to make Mr. Moment look like a criminal. It is now 640 days and Mr. Moment still has not seen his 3-year-old son who was being abuse and neglecting by Ms. Phillips. Ms. Phillips has refuses to let Mr. Moment see his son. And the court has refuses to enforce there on order of visitation.Complaint: 3
Inside the correction facility at 1307 Seven Locks Rd. Rockville, Md. and 22880 Whelan Lane, Boyds Md. the Montgomery County Judicial System is covering-up abuse within their facility. We at the National Organization for Justice would like to inform the citizen what is going on inside of one of Maryland correction facility. The Montgomery County has begun hiring minors to guarding inmates to save money, also inside of the Boyds Correction Facility inmates there are abuse, assault, battery, rapes, there is alcoholic use, attempted suicide that are taking place within this facility. Inside of this facility drugs are also being sold. The administrative body of Montgomery County and the facility are covering-up how some of the corrections officers are having sex with inmates, are how there are riots within this facility, how the inmates are being force to take part in the program, are how young teenagers are being put in this adult facility and attempted suicide and much more. Citizens of Montgomery County and the State of Maryland the correction system in your state have become a business and not a department of rehabilitation the State of Maryland is using your sons, daughters, husbands, and wives as shock. The State of Maryland is lockup individuals up on fraudulently charges to receive money from the Federal Government. The State of Maryland is holding individuals up to 60 to 90 days to receive credit from the Federal Government then the Maryland State Attorney’s Office offer the individual a plea to a lesser charge or time served.Complaint 4
Assault, Threat and Cover-up in the Montgomery County Correctional Facility On July 25th, 2007, at 9:20pm Mr. Sakkestand was receiving his nightly medication on unit W1-5 at the Montgomery County Correctional Facility at 22880 Whelan Lane Boyds, Maryland 20814. After taking his medicine from the nurse, Mr. Sakkestand stepped to the sink for a paper towel when correctional Officer L. Green ordered Mr. Sakkestand to lock-in. As Mr. Sakkestand was walking to his cell Officer L. Green grabbed Mr. Sakkestand jumpsuit from behind and picked him up where Mr. Sakkestand was on his tiptoes. Mr. Sakkestand told Office L. Green to take his hands off of him at which time Office L. Green stated “so what? I’m not worried about you! What you won’t to do something? You don’t want any of this! Officer L. Green then forcibly through Mr. Sakkestand into his cell and slammed the door behind him. Mr. Sakkestand requested an inmate grievance form from Officer L. Green, which he refused to give. Mr. Sakkestand received a form from his cellmate at which time Mr. Sakkestand filed the grievance on the assault by Officer L. Green. Mr. Sakkestand had requested to speak with the sergeant on duty several minutes later Sergeant Tate came to Mr. Sakkestand and asked what had happened. Mr. Sakkestand informed Sergeant Tate what happen and Sergeant Tate had Mr. Sakkestand signed the grievance and that he (Sergeant Tate) would forward the grievance to the unit manager. Thirty minute later Lieutenant Durough and not the unit manager came into Mr. Sakkestand cell. Lieutenant Durough stated to Mr. Sakkesand “if he did not drop the grievance that it was not going to be good for him,” Lieutenant Durough said he was tired and he did not want to do a bunch of paperwork. Lieutenant Durough stated, “It’s not like anyone got hurt or anything,” Lieutenant Durough then stated “he witness Offices L. Green putting his hands on you on the tape, but again it’s not like anyone got hurt” Lieutenant Durough then stated “ I’m just trying to deal with this on the lowest level as possible.” Mr. Sakkestand told Lieutenant Durough that he had been assault by Officer L. Green then Lieutenant Durough stated “if you want to play hardball, I will have you move to solitary confinement right now, now what do you want to do?” out of fear and the threat of going to the hole and more harassment Mr. Sakkestand told Lieutenant Durough he would not go forward with the grievance. Then Lieutenant Durough stated, “I’m going to handle this” he (Lieutenant Durough) called Officer L. Green in to Mr. Sakkestand cell and informed him Officer L. Green that he made a mistake and that Mr. Sakkestand was dropping the complaint because no one was hurt. Three days later Mr. Sakkestand informed a Captain Davis of the assault and threats made by Officer L. Green and Lieutenant Durough. Captain Davis then said she would order an investigation on the matter. Captain Davis then asked Mr. Sakkestand if he would like to file charges against both Mr. Green and Mr. Durough Mr. Sakkestand said yes he would. Captain Davis gave charge documents to Mr. Sakkestand which he full out and returned to Captain Davis. Mr. Sakkestand informed Captain Davis that there were several witness to the assault and the threat. The Montgomery County Correctional Facility at 22880 Whelan Lane Boyds, Maryland 20814 cover-up this incident Mr. Sakkestand complaint is not on recorded the videotape of the assault has not been found and these officers are still working at the Montgomery County Correctional Facility. Complaint: 5 Citizens of Montgomery County and the State of Maryland within the last two years there have been five children killed in the State of Maryland. In each of this unpleasant incidents the Montgomery County Judicial System and the Montgomery County Family Division has had a part in the incident There have been numerous complaints made to the office’s of the administrative body of the State of Maryland: County Executive Isaiah Leggett, Governor Martin O’Malley, Congressman Chris Van Hollen, Senator Barbara A. Mikulski, Senator Steny H. Hoyer, Congressman John P. Sarbanes, Attorney General of Maryland Douglas F. Gansler, the Consumer Protection Division of Maryland, the Commission on Judicial Disabilities of Maryland, Grievance Commission of Maryland, Maryland State Bar Association. About the problems and the corruption within this judicial system and this administrative body has continue to cover-up the problems. Now again more of our children have paid the price for their failure of them not do their job they were elected to do. Not one of these children would have die if this administrative body of the State of Maryland would have investigate the complaints filed with there offices and not push the complaints aside or pass them on to some other agencies who push them aside. Citizens of Montgomery County and the State of Maryland it is time for a change and to hold individuals and agencies accountable for their actions. If we don’t then their will be more of our children paying the price for the corruption and cover-up of this administrative body. The law is the law and in to many courtrooms in the State of Maryland the judges are not following the rules and laws. We at the National Organization for Justice would like to hear from citizens of Montgomery County and the State of Maryland who have filed complaints about the State of Maryland Judicial System. The National Organization for Justice would also like to hear from citizens who have a complaint they would like to file. Citizens of the State of Maryland it’s time for a change if we don’t change this corruption and cover-ups were going to lose another child. If this who was voted into office to uphold the law will not uphold the law then it’s time to vote them out and put someone who will.Complaint 6 Beating by Montgomery County Police
District of Columbia Complaint: 1 Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-up by the District of Columbia Judicial System On January 27th, 2004, a Mrs. Pearl Reardon filed complaint #011-879 with the Metropolitan Police Department of District of Columbia. Detective Donna Wilson badge #D2-300 and Detective Dejuan Williams badge #D2-202 of the Metropolitan Police interviewed Mr. Moment about the complaint Ms. Reardon made she stated that he threat her over the phone. Mr. Moment informed Detective Wilson he made no threat to Ms. Reardon and that he has never mat or seen Ms. Reardon. Mr. Moment informed Detective Wilson that this was about him dating her 37-year-old daughter, Ms. Felita A. Phillips. On April 7th, 2007, the Assistant United States Attorney Timothy W, Lucas filed an affidavit in support of an arrest warranted USW#384-04 for Mr. Moment. Superior Court Senior Judge Tim Murphy for the District of Columbia issues a warrant USW#38404 for Mr. Moment arrest for felony threats and felony kidnapping of Mrs. Pearl Reardon. After being informed that a warrant had been issues Mr. Moment turn himself in on May 11th, 2004, upon turning himself in Mr. Moment was informed that he was being charge with felony threats and felony kidnapping of Mrs. Pearl Reardon. While in jail a member of the District of Columbia Judicial System came to interview Mr. Moment and offer him a plea deal. Mr. Moment inform the person he was not pleading to any charge because he committed no crime and that he never mat or seen Ms. Reardon. The next day May 12th, 2004, Mr. Moment came before a Superior Court Judge where the charges of felony threats and felony kidnapping had been nolle prosequi (dismiss) and a new charge was filed against him #M0482804 of threats. Mr. Moment was then offer mediation by members of the District of Columbia Judicial System he refuse the offer because he committed no crime. On August 12th, 2004, Mr. Moment came before Superior Court Judge Craig Iscoe for trial in case#M4828-04 and after Ms. Reardon informed the court that this was the first time she ever seen Mr. Moment the charge were change again now Mr. Moment was being charge with attempted threats fraudulent charge. Mr. Moment was found guilty of attempted threats by Judge Iscoe then Mr. Moment was sentenced to (90) days ESS, 1year supervise probation, two years unsupervised probation, to stay away from Mrs. Reardon and her husband, 240 hours of community service within 10 months, successfully complete anger management classes, and to stay away from Ms. Phillips address and the entire block on which her residence is located on. On September 10th, 2004, Mr. Moment filed an appeal with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. On December 2nd, 2004, Mr. Moment went to the Court of Appeals for District of Columbia to find out why he had not heard anything from the court. Mr. Moment was informed that the lower court had not forward the court documents to their office. On March 15th, 2005, Mr. Moment filed a civil suit against the District of Columbia CA#05ca001888 for one million dollar. Then the Court of Appeals for District of Columbia dismisses Mr. Moment appeal. On June 17th, 2005, Mr. Moment came before Superior Court Judge Frederick H. Weisberg on the civil suit case#05ca00188 and case#05ca002103. Judge Weisberg informed the District of Columbia that they had not filed a response to the complaint and he (Judge Weisberg) gives them 60 more days to file a respond to Mr. Moment’s complaint. On October 7th, 2005, Mr. Moment came back before Judge Weisberg for an initial conference. Judge Weisberg asked the District of Columbia why they had not file a response as order June 17th, 2005. The attorney for the District of Columbia stated that they never receive the complaint Judge Weisberg then ask the attorney dose a he then stated a name work in your office? The attorney said yes, Judge Weisberg then told the attorney there is a registered mail card for service with a signer of that person who works in your office then Judge Weisberg told the attorney for the District of Columbia, she needed to find the complaint. On October 11th, 2005, Mr. Moment filed a motion for judgment by default against the District of Columbia. In an order Judge Weisberg denied Mr. Moment’s motion because he stated that he was given the District of Columbia more time to respond to the complaint. On December 5th, 2005, Mr. Moment filed a second motion for judgment by default against the District of Columbia because they still had not filed a response. On December 27th, 2005, Mr. Moment filed his complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia because it was now 283 days and the District of Columbia still had not filed a response to Mr. Moment complaint and Judge Weisberg had refuse to rule on the motion for judgment. Then on January 11th, 2005, Judge Weisberg after Mr. Moment filed a complaint on him (Judge Weisberg) with Chief Judge Rufus G. King III and after Chief Judge King transferred him (Judge Weisberg) off Mr. Moment’s case Judge Weisberg maliciously dismiss Mr. Moment’s civil suit in retaliation. Upon filing his civil suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Richard W. Roberts then dismiss the complaint stating that the complaint had been heard on its merits in the District of Columbia Superior Court. The Judicial System for the District of Columbia has refused to hear Mr. Moment complaint. Complaint: 2 |
|
Latest page update: made by
Anonymous
, May 4 2010, 3:36 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited anonymously
4 words added 2 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
More Info: links to this page
|
There are no threads for this page.
Be the first to start a new thread.
